论文部分内容阅读
近日,国家发改委、新闻出版总署、教育部发布通知称,考虑到循环使用教材特殊性以及印制、装订要求相对较高,中小学循环使用教材价格可在原有基础上上浮20%。(6月17日《京华时报》)教材循环使用,既节约了教育开支,又节约了大量社会资源,还具有很好的教育效果,所以为越来越多的国家采用。但是,全世界几乎没有一个国家因为推行教材循环使用制度,而允许教材涨价的先例。一般来说,国外对教材印制、装订有一个基本要求,然后靠市场竞争机制的“物美价廉、薄利多销”来提高教材的印装质量和降低价格,所以国外有很多价格
Recently, the State Development and Reform Commission, Press and Publication Administration, the Ministry of Education issued a circular that, given the special nature of recycling materials and printing, binding requirements are relatively high, primary and secondary teaching materials prices can be recycled on the basis of the original 20%. (June 17, “Beijing Times”) teaching material recycling, both to save educational expenditure, but also save a lot of social resources, but also has a very good educational effect, so more and more countries to adopt. However, few countries in the world have a precedent of allowing textbook prices because of the introduction of a recycling system. In general, foreign textbooks, binding a basic requirement, and then rely on market competition mechanism “inexpensive, small profits but quick turnover ” to improve the quality of teaching materials and lower the price of printing, so there are many foreign prices