论文部分内容阅读
半世纪以来,灭鼠剂有很大的进展。许多地区用抗凝血灭鼠剂灭鼠都取得了很好的效果。鼠害的损失至少减少75%。但是这些效果很难持久,如不采取其他措施,鼠密度很快又回升。尽管现代的防鼠建筑可以解决部分问题,但仍有不少情况,如野营施工作业、码头、船坞、菜市场以及正在运输途中的货物等,防鼠和防鼠建筑是难以实现的。因此,寄希望于化学驱鼠剂。化学驱鼠剂的研究并非新的动向,早在1932年农业上已有采用96A驱避野兔保护植物的报告,随后对有驱鼠作用化合物的筛选,试验方法,作用机制以及型式等问题都有比较系统的研究,但文献很分散。最近不断有人前来询问关于电缆和造林直插树籽和林苗的驱鼠问题。为了做好咨询服务工作,将有关的资料加以综述,以供参考。
Half a century, rodenticides have made great progress. In many areas rodenticides with anticoagulant rodenticides have achieved good results. Rodent damage reduced by at least 75%. However, these effects are very difficult to sustain. Without any other measures, the rat density will soon rise again. Although modern rodent control can solve some problems, there are still many situations, such as camping construction operations, docks, docks, vegetable markets and the goods are being transported, rodent and rodent building is difficult to achieve. Therefore, hope chemical anti-rat agent. The research on chemical raticides is not a new trend. As early as 1932, there was a report on the use of 96A to prevent hare in the protection of plants. Subsequently, the screening, experimental methods, mechanism and type of compounds with anti-rapture compounds have been reported More systematic research, but the literature is very scattered. There have been many recent questions asking questions about cables and planting rats and linters. In order to do a good job in consulting services, the relevant information will be reviewed for reference.