论文部分内容阅读
某电视台举办一个智力竞赛型的娱乐节目,邀请的是小学生、商人、政府官员和社会学家各一名。其中一道题是非常通俗的“脑筋急转弯”:树上有5只鸟,猎人用枪打死一只,还剩几只?主持人掌握的标准答案是零只,而四位嘉宾的答案分别是:4只、5只、4只、不确定。五花八门的答案让主持人一头雾水。她灵机一动,请他们谈谈各自答案的理由。小学生:猎人打死了鸟爸爸,树上还有鸟妈妈和三个孩子。三个小鸟还不会飞,鸟妈妈要保护三个孩子,不肯飞走,所以树上有四只鸟。小学生的话赢得了一片掌声。商人:猎人打枪前,小鸟早就向他行了贿,那一枪根本就没朝树上打,那只小岛也是
A television station hosts a quiz show that invites primary students, businessmen, government officials and sociologists. One of the questions is very popular “Riddles”: there are five birds in the tree, hunters shot a dead, there are only a few remaining? Moderator to master the standard answer is zero only, and four guests were the answer Yes: 4, 5, 4, not sure. A wide variety of answers to the host confused. She got a brainwash, asking them to talk about the reasons for their answers. Pupils: hunters killed bird dad, tree mother bird and three children. Three birds will not fly, bird mother to protect three children, refused to fly away, so there are four birds in the tree. The words of the pupils won a round of applause. Businessmen: hunters shot before the bird has long been his bribe, that shot did not hit the tree, the island is also