论文部分内容阅读
《江陵九店东周墓》发掘报告提出该墓地有34座墓葬属于白起拔郢之后的战国晚期晚段墓,本文认为该发掘报告结论中的类型学和年代分析依据都值得商榷。34座墓葬中大部分墓葬随葬品组合和器物的年代特征,都不能确定属于战国晚期偏晚。从社会背景看,白起拔郢后楚国人口大部分东迁,在九店一个墓地就发现34座楚墓,且墓葬中随葬较多青铜兵器,这些都与当时社会状况不符,因此我们应该对江陵地区战国晚期晚段的墓葬断代谨慎处理。
The excavation report of “Dongling Tombs of Jiangling Jiudian” proposed that there are 34 tombs in the cemetery belonging to late tomb of Late Warring States after the white strikes. This paper argues that the typology and the analysis of the chronological basis in the conclusion of this excavation report are all debatable. Most of the 34 burial funerary objects in the composition and artifacts of the chronology, are not sure belong to late Warring States period. From a social background, most of the population of the Chu nationality moved eastward after the start of the White War, and 34 Chu tombs were found in a graveyard of nine stores. More bronze weapons were buried in the tombs, which were not in accordance with the prevailing social conditions. Therefore, we should The late tombs of the Warring States Period in Jiangling area were cautiously handled in the late era.