论文部分内容阅读
目的对剖腹产后人工流产与正常分娩后人工流产进行对比研究。方法回顾324例剖腹产后人工流产和736例正常分娩后人工流产术疼痛、出血量、手术时间、不全流产、不良反应情况的发生。结果剖腹产术后人工流产组疼痛、出血量、手术时间、不全流产、不良反应的发生明显高于正常分娩后的人工流产组,(P≤0.05)。结论降低剖腹产率,加强人工流产的基本功训练,提高手术操作技术,是减轻疼痛、减少出血量、缩短手术时间,避免不全流产和不良反应发生的关键。
Objective To compare the artificial abortion after cesarean section and artificial abortion after normal delivery. Methods 324 cases of induced abortion after cesarean section and 736 cases of induced abortion after abortion were reviewed. The pain, bleeding volume, operation time, incomplete abortion and adverse reactions were retrospectively reviewed. Results The incidences of pain, bleeding, operation time and incomplete abortion in abortion group after cesarean section were significantly higher than those in induced abortion group (P≤0.05). Conclusions The key to reduce the rate of caesarean section, enhance the basic skills of induced abortion and improve the technique of operation is the key to relieve pain, reduce the amount of bleeding, shorten the operation time, avoid incomplete abortion and adverse reactions.