论文部分内容阅读
产品后续观察义务是产品责任领域的一项重要制度。我国《侵权责任法》第46条首次确立了产品后续观察义务,该项制度符合社会公平正义的观念,有利于维护社会公共安全。但是由于缺乏相关的司法解释,该项制度在适用过程中也出现了一些问题,例如产品后续观察义务是否排除了发展风险抗辩、生产者应该怎样更全面地履行产品后续观察义务等。因此,我国应该立足于现实情况,对产品后续观察义务中的具体制度进行改进,从而完善产品后续观察义务。
Observe product follow-up obligations is an important system of product liability. Article 46 of China’s Tort Liability Act establishes the obligation of follow-up observation for the first time. This system accords with the concept of social fairness and justice and is conducive to the maintenance of social public security. However, due to the lack of relevant judicial interpretation, some problems have appeared in the application of the system. For example, whether the follow-up observation obligation of the product ruled out the development risk defense and how the producer should perform the follow-up observation obligations more fully. Therefore, our country should base on the actual situation, to improve the specific system in the follow-up observation obligation of products, so as to improve the follow-up observation obligation of products.