论文部分内容阅读
一个学派的发展是一个不断进化的具有历史性和路径依赖性的过程。在新一代奥地利学派的学者们的影响下,奥地利学派重新发现了门格尔和米瑟斯的作品中的欧洲大陆解释学哲学遗产,把已陷入过于理论化僵局的奥地利学派经济学发展成一种解释学的学科。本文将试图从本体论出发重构奥地利学派理论硬核和方法论特点,以及比较它跟其他学派的共同点和区别。在这个基础之上,我们将鉴别解释学给奥地利学派的理论完整和发展前途带来的影响。我的结论是“解释学转向”为奥地利学派一直存在的两大难题,即“坚持主观主义方法论教条的奥地利学派能怎么从事制度研究”和“坚持先验主义的奥地利学派能怎么从事经验性研究”提供了解决的方向。两个问题的缓解给奥地利学派所关注的研究问题提供很多新的研究机会,并且使得奥地利学派成为经济学家的一种真正的理论选择。目前为止,中国经济学文献缺乏对奥地利学派的理论硬核,认识论和方法,尤其是对步入叙述转向的奥地利学派的吸收和反思。本文旨在弥补这一点,并且在考虑到奥地利学派的局限性的基础上,提出中国政治经济学从奥地利学派的经验中可兹借鉴之处。
The development of a school of thought is an evolving historical and path-dependent process. Under the influence of a new generation of Austrian scholars, the Austrian school rediscovered the continental hermeneutic and philosophical heritage of Menger and Mises and transformed the Austrian school of economics, which had fallen into an overly theoretical impasse, into a kind of Hermeneutic discipline. This article attempts to reconstruct the theoretical hard core and methodological features of the Austrian school from ontology and to compare it with the common ground and differences of other schools of thought. On this basis, we will identify the impact of hermeneutics on the theoretical integrity and development of the Austrian school. My conclusion is that the “Hermeneutic Turn” is one of the two main problems facing the Austrian School, namely, “how can the Austrians who adhere to the subjectivist dogma of institutionalism” and “the Austrians who insist on transcendentalism How to engage in empirical research ”provides a solution to the direction. The alleviation of both problems offers many new research opportunities to the Austrian school’s research issues and makes the Austrian School a real theoretical choice for economists. So far, the Chinese economics literature lacks the theoretical hard core, epistemology and methodology of the Austrian school, especially the absorption and reflection on the Austrian school that has stepped into the narrative. The purpose of this paper is to make up for this, and on the basis of the limitations of the Austrian school, it is proposed that China’s political economy can learn from the experience of the Austrian school.