一单讨论日本的新宪法,实在没什么劲儿。因为我想这不外一幕外交礼节。不管你愿不愿意,日本统治阶级得如是扮演。如说旧宪法是钦定的,新宪法即是日货贴的美国商标。只有贩卖假货的商人,纔对它发生兴趣。但就一部宪法说,我以为不妨拿它和中国的作一番比较研究。「比较宪法」这门课程,实际价值就在于此。 There is really no obstacle to discussing Japan’s new constitution alone. Because I think this is nothing more than diplomatic courtesy. Regardless of whether you like it or not, the ruling class in Japan plays as well. For example, the old constitution is appointed, the new constitution is the United States trademark of Japanese goods. It is only interested in traders selling fake goods. But as far as a constitution says, I thought I might as well take some comparative studies with China. The real value of the “more constitutional” course lies here.