To understand the characteristics of seismic response at liquefied sites,a liquefiable site and a nonliquefiable site were selected,separated by about 500 m and having the same site conditions as Class D in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program(NEHRP).A suite of earthquake records on rock sites are selected and scaled to the spectrum of the Joyner,Boore,and Fumal(JBF) attenuation model for a magnitude 7.5 earthquake at a distance of 50 km.The scaled records were then used to excite the two sites.The effect of pore-water pressure was investigated using the effective stress analysis method,and nonlinear soil behavior was modeled by a soil bounding surface model.Comparisons for spectra,peak ground acceleration(PGA),peak ground displacement(PGD) and permanent displacement were performed.Results show that the mean ground response spectrum at the non-liquefied site is close to the estimated ground response spectrum from the JBF model,but the mean ground response spectrum at the liquefied site is much lower than the estimated ground response spectrum from the JBF model for periods of up to 1.3 s.The mean PGA at the non-liquefied site is about 1.6-1.7 times as large as that at the liquefied site,but the mean peak ground displacement(PGD) at the non-liquefied site has a slight difference with that at the liquefied site.The mean permanent displacements at the liquefied site are larger than those at the non-liquefied site,particularly at the liquefied layer. To understand the characteristics of seismic response at liquefied sites, a liquefiable site and a nonliquefiable site were selected, separated by about 500 m and having the same site conditions as as Class D in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). A suite of earthquake records on rock sites are selected and scaled to the spectrum of the Joyner, Boore, and Fumal (JBF) attenuation model for a magnitude 7.5 earthquake at a distance of 50 km. scaled records were then used to excite the two sites. effect of pore-water pressure was investigated using the effective stress analysis method, and nonlinear soil behavior was modeled by a soil bounding surface model. Comparisons for spectra, peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground displacement (PGD) and permanent displacement were performed. Results show that the mean ground response spectrum at the non-liquefied site is close to the estimated ground response spectrum from the JBF model, but the mean ground response spectrum at the l iquefied site is much lower than the estimated ground response spectrum from the JBF model for periods of up to 1.3 s. The mean PGA at the non-liquefied site is about 1.6-1.7 times as large as that at liquefied site, but the mean peak ground displacement (PGD) at the non-liquefied site has a slight difference with that at the liquefied site. The mean permanent displacements at the liquefied site are larger than those at the non-liquefied site, particularly at the liquefied layer.