论文部分内容阅读
一、新时期农史研究利病及“主体意识”、“体制化”概念的提出“社会科学危机”!“史学危机”!农史安危何以系之?然而稍稍细审“危机论”者种种骇世危言,颇背于我国史学乃至社科领域图变奋进的主潮流,同当前改革开放的大趋势更成极不协调的悖论,崇真务实的农史界自不会轻被其惑。唯是这些危论能在学界蔚为一小思潮,自然有一定的社会和认识根源,其中也不乏某些合理和积极的因素。仅从其倾斜歪曲的视角,即折射
First, the study of the history of the new era of disease and disease and “subjective consciousness” and “institutionalization” put forward the concept of “social science crisis”! “Historical Crisis” Why the safety of agricultural history? However, It is contrary to the current trend of reform and opening up to the extremely uncoordinated paradox that the truth and pragmatism in the history of agriculture and forestry are not to be taken lightly by themselves . It is only these crises that can be regarded as a small trend in the academic world and naturally have certain social and cognitive roots. There are also some reasonable and positive factors. Only from its skewed perspective, ie refracted