论文部分内容阅读
目的应用Vitapex根充糊剂诱导年轻恒牙根尖的形成,观查其临床疗效。方法选择137例200颗牙外伤或已有牙髓病变的年轻恒牙。常规牙髓处理后,采用两种不同的根管糊剂根充,进行疗效对比分析。结果经过3个月—2年定期复诊和随访,注射式Vitapex根充糊剂与氢氧化钙根充糊剂远期治疗效果有显著差异;其临床症状及X线片牙根及根尖发育情况好,成功率高,根尖诱导作用明显。结论注射式Vitapex根充糊剂优于氢氧化钙根充糊剂,更适合作为临床常规年轻恒牙牙根形成术的诱导剂。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of Vitapex root-filling paste on the induction of root tip of young permanent teeth. Methods 137 cases of 200 permanent teeth or traumatic lesions of young permanent teeth were selected. Conventional endodontic treatment, root canal paste with two different root canal, the efficacy of comparative analysis. Results After 3 months to 2 years of regular follow-up and follow-up, there was a significant difference in the long-term therapeutic effect between injecting Vitapex root-filling paste and calcium hydroxide root-filling paste. The clinical symptoms and root tip and root tip development of X-ray films were good , High success rate, root tip induction obvious. Conclusion Injectable Vitapex root filling agent is better than calcium hydroxide root filling agent, and is more suitable as an inducer of clinical common permanent root formation.