论文部分内容阅读
散文理论、散文批评在整个文学理论和文学批评家族中,一直是个靠东挪西借过日子的穷亲戚。相当长的一段时期以来,尤其是有关现当代散文理论和散文批评,始终未曾超越周作人和郁达夫为《中国新文学大系》“散文一集”、“散文二集”所作的序文的水准。可以说,散文理论和散文批评在长达半个世纪之久的时间里,走的是一条向后退的路子。要了解这一点,读者可以先阅读一下梁向阳著《当代散文流变研究》①的第七章②。进入二十一世纪以来,有关散文理论、散文批评和当代散文史的著作,
Prose theory, prose criticism throughout the literary theory and literary criticism family, has been a poor relative by the days of Norway. For a long period of time, especially concerning the theory of modern prose and prose criticism, Zhou Zuoren and Yu Dafu have never surpassed those made by Zhou Zuoren and Yu Dafu for “A Collection of Chinese New Literature”, “Prose Essays” and “Prose Essays” Preface of the standard. It can be said that prose theory and prose criticism took as long as half a century’s time to go backward. To understand this, readers can read the chapter VII of Liang Xiangyang’s “Studies of the Contemporary Prose” ①. Since entering the twenty-first century, books on prose theory, prose criticism and contemporary prose history,