论文部分内容阅读
关于萧军第一次抵达延安的情况,牛津版萧军《延安日记》出版之后,一些评述文章不但与历史脱钩,也与萧军本人就其整个延安生涯的亲述差之甚远,且缺乏相应的时代意识与文史知识。刊登在2014年4月17日《南方周末》“往事”栏,由陈益南先生撰写的《〈延安日记〉里的萧军与毛泽东》这一整版文章,就是其中的一例。萧军是鲁迅的“头号弟子”吗?先谈为绝大多数文史学者深感错讹明显的一处。陈益南先生这样写道:
As for Xiao Jun’s first arrival in Yan’an, some review articles of Xiao Jun’s “Yan’an Diary” published in Oxford not only broke down with history, but also fell far short of Xiao Jun himself’s demeanor on his entire Yanan career and lacked Corresponding Awareness of Times and Knowledge of Literature and History. One full page of the article “Xiao Jun and Mao Zedong in Yan’an Diary” written by Mr. Chen Yimin published on “Southern Weekend” and “Past Issues” on April 17, 2014 is one example. Xiao Jun is Lu Xun’s “number one disciple”? First of all, for the vast majority of history and culture scholars deeply mistaken one obvious. Mr. Chen Yimin wrote: