论文部分内容阅读
被告人、延富,男54岁,××矿务局机电处配件科副科长。1989年3月31日家中被盗,本人报称丢失现金43,000元,经侦破和勘查现场,发现家中有大量现金、存折和有价证券等,与失盗款共计87,000余元。后经立案、侦察,从被告人延富的累计合法收入中减去其现有财产和支出,尚有63,000余元,本人不能说明其合法来源。对如此巨额财产来源不明的暴发户,能否治罪呢?依照全国人大常委会《关于惩治贪污罪贿赂罪的补充规定》第11条第一款之规定:“国家工作人员的财产或者支出明显超过合法收入,差额巨大的,可以查令说明来源。本人不能说明其来源是合法的,差额
Defendant, Yan Fu, male, 54 years old, × × Mining Bureau Electrical and Mechanical Services Branch deputy section chief. On March 31, 1989, he was stolen from his home and claimed to have lost $ 43,000 in cash. After detecting and investigating the scene, he found a large amount of cash, passbooks and marketable securities in his home. After filing, reconnaissance and deduction of the existing property and expenditures from the accumulated legal revenue of the defendant, there was still more than $ 63,000. I can not explain its legal source. According to the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 11 of the “Supplementary Provisions on Punishment of Corruption Bribery Crimes” of the NPC Standing Committee, "the property or expenses of the state staff members obviously exceed Legitimate income, the difference is huge, you can check the source. I can not explain the source is legal, the difference