一九九三年九月的《读书》上,有我一篇“《茶馆》前后”,得到一些同“好”的关心,告诉我一些有关的议论与资料。随着我写了一篇短文“《茶馆》前后的后话”,发表在去年四月的《戏剧电视报》上。我在“《茶馆》前后”中有这么几句话: “五十年代是哪几位艺术家,跟老舍说,他的草稿中有一场戏很好,示意照这一场写一个戏。现在说不清这几位是谁?谈话时都有谁谁在场?老舍怎样思考又怎样回答?几十年过去了,作家和导演作古了。”新近经人指点,读到一九九三年五月的《新剧本》上有篇回忆文章:“话剧《茶馆》上演的前前后后”,作者赵起扬,是北京人民艺 There was an article on “Reading in September 1993” that read “My Teahouse” and got some “good” cares and told me some relevant arguments and materials. As I wrote an essay entitled “After the Teahouse”, it was published in the Drama Television in April last year. There are a few words I said before and after “The Tea House”: “Which of the artists in the 1950s said to Lao She that there is a scene in his draft that shows a scene like this one? Now let’s say Who do these people know when they are talking? How did Laosou think? After decades, writers and directors have become old-fashioned. ”As recent news, “New Screenplay” has a memory article: “Drama” teahouse “staged before and after”, the author Zhao Qi Yang, Beijing People’s Arts