《法学》1990年第10期发表的《审判委员会决定的案件裁判书应由审判委员署名》一文,认为人民法院审判委员会讨论决定的案件,裁判书应由参加讨论决定的审判委员会各委员署名。笔者持不同意见。首先,审判委员会是我国特有的一种审判组织形式,它不直接审判案件,只对经合议庭审理的重大的或者疑难的案件进行讨论或作出决定。其次,《刑事诉讼法》第107条规定,“审判委员会的决定,合议庭应当执行”,即合议庭必须服从审判委员会的意见,当然审判委员会的意见就是合议庭的意见。第三,合议庭组成人员在裁判文书上署名并不代表 Law of the People’s Republic of China, published in the tenth issue of 1990, “Judgment by the Judicial Committee shall be signed by the Judges”. It is believed that the cases discussed and decided by the Judicial Committee of the People’s Court should be decided by the members of the Judicial Committee participating in the discussion. The author holds different opinions. First of all, the adjudication committee is a form of trial organization that is peculiar to our country. It does not try the case directly, but only discusses or makes decisions on major or difficult cases before the collegial panel. Secondly, Article 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that “the decision of the judicial committee and the collegial bench should be implemented”, that is, the collegial bench must obey the opinion of the judicial committee. Of course, the opinion of the judicial committee is the opinion of the collegial panel. Thirdly, the names of the members of the collegial panel in their signature are not representative