论文部分内容阅读
我国死刑案件审理程序包括死刑案件的一审程序、二审程序和死刑复核程序,三者是一个统一的有机整体。随着最高人民法院收回死刑核准权,对我国死刑案件审理程序进行整体改造和完善已经成为一条既具有科学合理性又具有现实基础的改革思路。根据这一思路,死刑案件审理程序的各个阶段应遵循一些共同的程序公正要求,同时基于各阶段的特点和职能,在具体的诉讼程序设计上又应具有个性特征。三个环节应当各有侧重、繁简得当,共同在确保死刑案件质量、控制死刑数量等方面发挥作用。
The procedures for handling death penalty cases in our country include the first instance procedure, the second instance procedure and the death penalty review procedure of death penalty cases, all of which are a unified organic whole. With the Supreme People’s Court recovering the power of death penalty approval, the overall reform and perfection of the hearing procedure of death penalty cases in our country has become a reform idea that is both scientific and rational and has a realistic basis. According to this idea, all stages of the death penalty case hearing procedure should follow some common procedural fairness requirements. At the same time, based on the characteristics and functions of each stage, they should have their own personality characteristics in the design of specific litigation procedures. Each of the three links should have its own focus and properly handled, and play a role in ensuring the quality of death penalty cases and controlling the number of death penalty.