论文部分内容阅读
哲学思维要不要精确化?哲学思维能不能精确化?这个问题,在我国哲学工作者中,一直存在着两种不同的意见。赞成者因不满于时下哲学思维之过于空泛、过于笼统,大而化之的状况,主张哲学思维应该多一点实证精神,实现类似科学的精确化思维;反对者则认为不清晰是哲学的一种美德,因此,精确化对于哲学思维是个多余的要求,应该抛弃,他们断言任何关于哲学思维精确化的设想可能是个坏念头,其结果将会导致哲学思维失去美丽的思想翅膀,从而使哲学思维混同于科学思维。显然,上述分歧是由于争论双方都把精确化仅理解为数学化所引起的。
Should philosophical thinking be accurate? Can philosophical thinking be accurate? This question has always had two different opinions among the philosophers in our country. For those who are dissatisfied with the overly vague, oversized and oversized philosophical thinking nowadays, the pro-philosophy advocates that the philosophical thinking should have a little more positivistic spirit and realize the precise thinking similar to science; the opponents think that the indefiniteness is a kind of philosophy Therefore, precision is an unnecessary requirement for philosophical thinking and should be abandoned. They assert that any assumption of the precision of philosophical thinking may be a bad idea. As a result, philosophical thinking will lose its beautiful wings of thought and the philosophical thinking will be confused In scientific thinking. Obviously, the above differences are caused by the fact that both sides of the debate understand precision as merely mathematicalization.