论文部分内容阅读
哈贝马斯从理论与实践的关系问题出发引出了他的“话语”理论,并基于实践与技术的区分强调了话语的实践性质,提出了“实践话语”的观念。在这种实践话语中,话语参与者以语言为媒介,针对共同生活世界中的公共议题,为了论证规范的有效性而进行提议、批判、争论和证明,从而达成了具有普遍有效性的合理共识。这样,在公共领域中,他所提出的这种实践话语理论就将伦理话语、道德话语和政治话语这三个维度内在地融合在一起,从而成为多元的价值主体之间形成合理政治共识的一种可能路径。
Habermas leads his theory of “discourse ” from the relation between theory and practice, emphasizes the practice nature of discourse based on the distinction between practice and technology, and puts forward the concept of “practice discourse ”. In this kind of practical discourse, discourse participants adopt linguistic media to propose, criticize, debate and prove the public topics in the common life world in order to demonstrate the validity of the norms so as to reach a reasonable consensus of universal validity . In this way, in the public sphere, his theory of practical discourse integrates three dimensions of ethical discourse, moral discourse and political discourse in an inherent manner, thus becoming a kind of reasonable political consensus among pluralistic value subjects Possible path