20世纪中国文学史的研究和著述可谓汗牛充栋,形成了一套相对固定的学科知识谱系。与此同时,学科在知识生产上的故步自封,也制约了文学史研究的观念和方法、价值体系、资料体系的创新。问题表现在,一方面,很多文学史著作面目雷同,从断代、分期到章节、体例再到作家、作品的选择,基本上如出一辙,尤其是以阶级斗争为指导的文学史观念,很长时间内主导了文学史的著述,导致了文学 The research and writings of the 20th century Chinese literary history are full of efforts, forming a relatively fixed spectrum of disciplinary knowledge. At the same time, disciplines in the production of knowledge of self-styled, but also restricted the concept of literature history and methods, value system, data system innovation. The problems are as follows: On the one hand, many works of literary history are identical in appearance. Basically, the selection of works from the time of division, periodization to chapters, and then to writers and writers is basically the same. In particular, the concept of literary history, guided by class struggle, Dominant literature history, led to literature