论文部分内容阅读
随着中国法制化进程的加快,理性、克制和制度化被摆在日益重要的位置,但也出现了过度强调理性化、程序化和专业化的现象,从而对注重情感表达、在许多时候处于弱势的女性当事人产生不利影响。这在男女两性分列诉讼两造的离婚诉讼中尤为明显,具体体现为“效率优先于公平”、“差异化对待两性诉讼主体”以及“排他性支持男权化主张”等。对于这种司法人员注重理性的思维方式、逻辑严谨的表达方式、条理清晰的推理方式和严格的法律程序,以及忽略、不重视甚至不给予机会让当事人进行带有情感因素的表达、陈述和宣泄的现象,本文称之为“司法男权化”。本文通过对“司法男权化”这一概念进行定义,并以基层法院离婚案庭审为视角,剖析其具体构成性原则,进而从当下中国社会主义司法实践当中的“国家女性主义”传统汲取养分,提出司法实践中的纠偏进路。
With the acceleration of the process of legalization in China, rationality, restraint and institutionalization are placed in an increasingly important position. However, there has also been an over-emphasis on the phenomenon of rationalization, proceduralization, and specialization, and thus the emphasis on emotional expression is, at many times, Disadvantaged female clients have a negative impact. This is particularly evident in divorce litigation, where both men and women separate the litigation, specifically as “efficiency over equity”, “differentiation of litigants” and “exclusive support of patriarchal propositions”. . This kind of judiciary pays attention to the rational way of thinking, the logical way of expressing, the reasoning way and strict legal procedure clearly, as well as ignoring, not paying attention or even giving the opportunity to let the parties carry out the emotional expression, statement and catharsis This phenomenon is called “Judicial Patriarchalization” in this article. This article defines the concept of “patriarchal judiciary” and analyzes the concrete constitutional principles from the perspective of divorce court trial in grass-roots court. Then from the perspective of the contemporary socialist feudalism in China, Traditionally, it draws up nutrients and puts forward the way of rectification in judicial practice.