Experience of radical videoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with modification

来源 :CUA2015全国泌尿男生殖系统肿瘤专题会议(10th)暨2015年广东省医学会泌尿外科学学术年会 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:forreg
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  Orjective: Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VIL) is a recently described lymphadenectomy with the same template of the open technique, it was reported that it could decrease morbidity,and the oncological results were uncertain for short-term follow-up.To improve feasibility and effectiveness of VIL, we performed radical VIL with critical modification.Methods: Patients with risks of inguinal metastases from penile cancer were offered VIL.Using three ports: along the inferior bordline, one at the middle with 10mm,one at the medial and lateral with 5mm, respectively.4.5cm incision in the middle of the inferior borderline was performed, and a space about 8cm x 3cm for videoscopic apparatus was exposed.Along the semitransparent membrane, tissues between the superficial layer of Campers fascia and fascia lata were dissected.Then the saphenous vein was divided for preservation.Trocar was set and the incision was sutured.The same template of the open technique was marked, and fine-needles were inserted into the videoscopic space to identify the borderlines.Specimens were removed through the inferior incision and the removal scope was checked.Clinico-pathologic and peri-operative outcome data were recorded.Results: Seventy VIL was performed in 38 patients with penile cancer.Median age was 42 (range 32-67) years.Median body mass index was 23 (range 18-33).Median operative time was 90 (range 65-135) minutes, and median number of collected nodes was 12 (range 8-17) in each lateral.Wound complications were observed in 7 laterals.Three patient developed lymphoeyst without any wound dehiscences, 1 patient suffered infection and 3 patients with diabetes had mild skin flap necrosis, which resolved with minimal local care.Onclusions: Radical VIL is as feasible as open inguinal lymphadenectomy.In our growing experience, node harvest is more than modified VIL.Further comparative analysis of radical and modified VIL is being pursued in a larger, prospective trial.
其他文献
目的:分析总结多寐的中医理论基础来源,并分析其病因病机,以对症治疗,取得理想临床疗效。方法:通过以五脏的理论为基础,具体分析其产生的病因病机,然后以阴阳学说、卫气学说及情志因素为病因病机的具体阐述,而后列出相应的治疗方法。结果:采用五脏论治的方法归纳的治疗方法在临床中取得有效的治疗。结论:中医对多寐的研究与治疗己形成了独特的中医理论体系,这些基础的理论研究,可以很好的指导临床,根据不同的情况以不同
脏腑病辨证是中医辨证体系中的重要内容。脏腑病辨证的基本思路为首辨病位,次辨病性。本文浅谈心、肝、脾、肺、肾五脏病辨证的思路,并举例说明之。重点是掌握如何辨病位,认识特征性症状与一般性症状,抓主要矛盾。
脉诊是中医学的瑰宝,脉诊一直都是中医学对各种疾病最有效、最基本的检查手段之一。因此,中医诊断学教学必须进行脉诊实训教学,主要就是要重视诊脉技能的培养,加强实践环节。脉诊实训教学实践证明,在见习基地相对不足的情况下,通过脉诊实训课教学,使抽象玄奥的脉象通过学生相互练习诊脉和具体可触的模拟脉象装置,为学生理解脉诊理论、 掌握脉象提供了新的教学方法和手段。学生不仅能亲自动手,而且还可以反复练习,加深对常
Several studies have evaluated the risk factors influencingthe biochemical recurrence (BCR)in patients who have received salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP), but the re
会议
Male Circumcision (MC) has been reported to reduce HPV prevalence in men.However, the efficacy remains imprecise.The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the liter
会议
目的 分析当前中国局限性前列腺癌病理特点.方法 在此项研究中,我们通过回顾性分析本中心2012~2014年间总共230例行前列腺癌根治术患者,术后标本通过应用整体组织病理切片的方法分析前列腺癌患者病理特点.结果 患者中位年龄68岁,初诊首发症状中仅仅为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高为64.3%.根据前列腺癌术后风险评分(Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment
会议
目的 中国男性人群前列腺癌的发病率和死亡率正在迅速升高,准确预测前列腺癌风险仍具有非常大的挑战,其中一个主要的因素是减少不必要的前列腺穿刺活检的对患者造成的损失.因此,我们应探索如何通过整合肿瘤标志物来改善针对具有前列腺癌风险者的临床决策.因此,我们在基于医院的国人前列腺穿刺活检队列中,研究年龄因素是否会对前列腺癌遗传学风险评分(GRS)预测前列腺穿刺结果有影响.方法:2012年4月和2014年8
会议
目的 探讨腹腔镜肾癌腔静脉癌栓取出十下腔静脉成形术的临床安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析2014年7月~2014年10月行后腹腔镜肾癌腔静脉癌栓取出十下腔静脉成形术的临床资料,男性4例,女性2例,年龄63~74岁.癌栓mayo分级level Ⅱ级5例,Ⅲ级1例.右侧4例,左侧2例.后腹腔途径4例,后腹腔十经腹腔1例,完全经腹腔(左肾癌)1例.后腹腔途径:4个穿刺位点入路,先处理肾动脉,然后广泛游离
会议
目的 评估比较采用超声非端扫(侧扫)引导前列腺尖部穿刺法、采用超声端扫引导前列腺尖部穿刺法对缓解经直肠前列腺穿刺活检术中疼痛的疗效.方法 回顾性分析我院2013年11月至2015年1月经直肠超声引导下12针前列腺穿刺活检患者119例.根据是否采用超声端扫引导前列腺尖部穿刺将患者分为2组,其中端扫组59例、非端扫组60例.两组均未采用麻醉.穿刺结束后立即采用视觉疼痛评分尺(VAS)对直肠指诊(DRE
会议
目的 探讨左肾癌根治术中发生医源性脾切除的危险因素.方法 回顾我院1999年3月至2014年9月所有接受左肾癌根治术的病例,根据患者术中是否发生脾切除术分为切脾和非切脾两组,收集患者一般情况、肿瘤特征、手术细节等资料,对发生脾切除的危险因素进行分析.结果 370例患者接受了左肾癌根治术,其中48例(13.0%)行脾切除术.单因素分析显示相对于非切脾组,切脾组≥65岁患者比例更高(33.3%比18.
会议