论文部分内容阅读
在被害人教义学中,自我决定权属于法益的构成要素,而非同法益平行看待。被同意主体的同一性、同意侵害方式的特定性、同意侵害后的拒绝权作为自我决定权的关联概念,需要在刑法家长主义的交互约谈下确认其是否属于法益的内涵。被同意主体的同一性是法益个别化机能的体现,原则上应界定为法益的内涵,但在专横医疗行为中存在例外。同意侵害方式的特定性包括行为方式的特定性和结果方式的特定性,原则上不是法益的内涵,但在超出构成要件范围和紧急状态下的动机错误情形下,应认定属于法益内涵,产生阻却同意成立的效力。同意侵害后的反悔权应当属于被害人同意中自我决定权的法益内涵,但在拒不退出型侵犯住宅安宁的情形下,应排斥在住宅安宁权法益内涵之外。
In the doctrine of victims, self-determination belongs to the elements of law, rather than to the parallel with law. The identity of the subject to be agreed, the particularity of the mode of violation and the consent of the right of rejection after the violation as the concept of association of self-determination need to confirm whether they belong to the connotation of legal interest under the interactive interviews of patriarchal criminal law. The identity of the subject to be agreed is the manifestation of the individualization of the legal interests, which should be defined in principle as legal interests, but there are exceptions in the arbitrary medical practices. The particularity of the consenting infringement mode includes the particularity of the behavior mode and the particularity of the mode of the result, which is not the connotation of the legal interest in principle. However, in the case of motivation error beyond the scope of the constitutional requirements and the state of emergency, Agree to the effect of establishment. However, the connotation of legal right to self-determination in the consent of the victim should be excluded from the connotation of the legal rights and interests of residential tranquility in the case of refusing to leave the type of violation of residential tranquility.