论文部分内容阅读
制度分析与发展(IAD)框架是奥斯特罗姆夫妇的重要学术贡献,是公共管理和政策研究领域的重要理论框架。在过去三十年间,IAD框架被广泛应用于各种理论和实证研究,其中在公共池塘资源领域的研究中应用尤为广泛。本文以灌溉系统这一典型的公共池塘资源研究文献为例,评估IAD框架作为制度与政策分析工具的主要优势和不足。总体而言,IAD框架在经验应用方面的优势包括提供了制度分析的通用语言、包容多学科的范式,便于处理复杂性,辅助研究设计和组织,提供制度研究的有益概念。当然,IAD框架在实际应用中也暴露出一些缺点或问题,比如系统应用的成本较高,比较复杂而不易掌握,提供宏观指导但难以深入,使用子分类操作性不强。鉴于此,本文提出了旨在促进IAD框架应用的建议,并展望了其在中国的应用前景。
The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework is an important academic contribution of Ostrom and is an important theoretical framework in the field of public administration and policy research. In the past three decades, the IAD framework has been widely used in various theoretical and empirical studies, of which the IAD framework has been widely used in the research of public pond resources. This paper takes the irrigation system, a typical public pond resource research literature as an example, to assess the main strengths and weaknesses of the IAD framework as a tool for institutional and policy analysis. Overall, the IAD framework’s advantages in empirical applications include providing a common language for institutional analysis, inclusive multidisciplinary paradigms, ease of handling complexity, supporting research design and organization, and providing useful concepts for institutional research. Of course, IAD framework exposes some shortcomings or problems in practical application. For example, the cost of system application is relatively high, complex and difficult to grasp, it is difficult to provide macroscopic guidance, and the operation of sub-classification is not strong. In view of this, this article puts forward some suggestions to promote the application of IAD framework and looks forward to its application prospect in China.