论文部分内容阅读
The emergence of a Philosophy of Information (PI) reflects the central role of information science and technology in current society and information theory in current thought.New informational methods for studying human mental activity have enabled a better understanding of the age-old philosophical problems about the nature of mind, consciousness and self.In a recent paper, Luciano Floridi has applied his pioneering work on the Philosophy of Information① to illuminating the nature of Personal Identity.I respond here to Floridis challenge in that paper to find further ways of describing and understanding Personal Identity.I will refer to Wu Kuns thirty years of his pioneering work in China on the Philosophy of Information that is just now becoming available in English.Given the ubiquity of information, Wu sees the Philosophy of Information as a metaphilosophy,encompassing all other philosophies and implying major changes in the methodology and scope of philosophy itself.This work included an informational interpretation of Personal Identity②.From this starting point, my paper argues that five new things must be done to arrive at an adequate, operative concept of Personal Identity: 1) the concept of identity itself must be clarified and distinguished from the related concepts of unity, individuality, self and uniqueness; 2) personal identity must be seen for what it clearly is, not a static entity but a process embodying both stability and change; 3) the relevant processes must be seen as constituted by information, that is,informational processes; 4) an appropriate logic must be used to descrioe the emergence and dynamical evolution of these processes; and 5) the grounding of this logic in physics and the related, resulting energy and process ontology must be outlined..Here, I will refer to my work on a non-standard, non-propositional logic-Logic in Reality (LIR)-which is applicable to real complex processes, including information and identity.My conclusion is that the Floridi and Wu epistemological and ontological descriptions of Personal Identity in informational terms complement and inform one another.I show that their views converge as regards the necessity of an informational ethics-a valuation of the other-that is appropriate for the developing information society.