同为轴心时代经典,《薄伽梵歌》倡导行动瑜伽,实现个体与至上者的不二联结,从而获得个体解脱,维护宇宙秩序;《道德经》则倡导无为而治,个体回归道本。前者指导积极战斗,履行社会责任的生活方式;后者却提倡守虚静,处事偏好守柔、守弱。本文通过具体分析两个文本的行动思想,特别是从行动瑜伽和无为的性质、行为过程、前提条件,行动者和至上者的关系等方面说明虽然两种传统的行动思想路径不同,达到的功效却相似。两者至少在伦理学和救赎意义上不存在直接冲突。 The same as the axis of the times classic, “Bhagavad-gita” advocate action yoga, to achieve the unity of the individual and the supremacy, so as to obtain individual relief, to maintain the order of the universe; “moral class” advocated doing nothing, individual return to the original. The former guides active fighting and fulfills the social responsibility of life style; the latter advocates keeping quiet, doing things conservatively and keeping the weak. This article shows that although the two traditional ideas of action have different pathways and reached the goal of efficiency through concrete analysis of the action ideas of the two texts, especially from the aspects of action yoga and inhuman nature, behavior process, preconditions and the relationship between actors and supremacy, It is similar. At least there is no direct conflict between ethics and salvation.