论文部分内容阅读
《刑法修正案(九)》通过消除猥亵型犯罪对象的性别限制实现性侵男性行为的犯罪化。由于以“猥亵”定义性侵男性行为之立法体例与刑法整体的性犯罪体系不相兼容,无论对“猥亵”的含义进行宽泛抑或狭窄的解释,均导致相应犯罪认定中若干悖论,男性性权利保障之立法目的进而被部分搁置。立法机关所持的保守性观念及对社会情势的消极回应是该悖论的根源。考察域外立法:现今多数国家奉行男女性权利一体保护的立法体例,被害人的性别不影响犯罪定性。悖论的消解,应在接轨世界主流立法体例的基础上,合理扩张“性交”的范围,妥当划分“性交”与“猥亵”的外延;同时将针对儿童的性侵纳入相应罪名中,不再单独成罪;最后矫正《刑法》第237条法定刑幅度轻重失衡的格局,由此构建“严而不厉”的男性性权利刑法保护体系。
Amendments to the Criminal Law (IX) Criminalization of sexual assault of men through the elimination of sexual restrictions on the object of obscenity. Because of the “indecent” definition of sexual invading male sexual behavior of the legislative system and the criminal law as a whole is not compatible with the sexual crime system, regardless of the “obscenity” meaning a broad or narrow meaning, have led to a number of violations of the corresponding criminal identification On the other hand, the legislative purpose of guaranteeing the sexual rights of men is in turn set aside. The conservative idea held by the legislature and its negative response to the social situation are the root causes of this paradox. Expatiation on Extraterritorial Legislation: Most countries nowadays follow the legislative system of the protection of the rights of both men and women. The sex of the victim does not affect the character of the crime. The dissolution of the paradox should be based on the mainstream of the world’s legislative system, the rational expansion of the scope of “sexual intercourse ”, the appropriate division of “sexual intercourse ” and “indecent” extension; at the same time will be targeted at children’s sexual abuse into The corresponding crimes, no longer a separate crime; finally rectify the “criminal law” Article 237 of the law of the magnitude of the pattern of the magnitude of the imbalance, thus building a “strict but not rigorous” male sexual rights criminal law protection system.