论文部分内容阅读
由于体裁和内容类似,长期以来,人们总是习惯于将《昭忠录》和《宋史》(主要是《宋史·忠义传》)放在一起比较。通常认为,《昭忠录》成书在《宋史》之前,但仅限民间传录,未尝上送史馆,故元人纂修《宋史》时未能参考《昭忠录》。然而,通过对二书相关内容的文字比较和史源考察,我们不难发现,《昭忠录》相当内容参考自晚宋官方史籍或元初史臣所撰之《宋史》底稿。
Due to their similar genre and content, people have long been accustomed to comparing “Zhaozhonglu” with “Songshi” (mainly “Biography of Loyalty to the Song Dynasty”). It is generally believed that “Zhaozhong Lu” became a book before “Song History”, but only folk records were not sent to the History Museum. Therefore, the compilation of “History of Song” by Yuan did not make reference to “Zhao Zhong Lu”. However, by comparing the texts of the two books with historical sources, we can easily find out that the content of “Zhao Zhong Lu” refers to the manuscript of “Song Shi” authored by the official history books of the late Song Dynasty or the historians of Yuan Dynasty.