论文部分内容阅读
比较了生物活性检测法（ｂｉｏａｓｓｙ，ＢＡ）与酶联免疫吸附法（ＥＬＩＳＡ）对大鼠腹腔巨噬细胞（ｍａｃｒｏｐｈａｇｅｓ，Ｍφ）分泌的肿瘤坏死因子－α（ｔｕｍｏｒｎｅｃｒｏｓｉｓｆａｃｔｏｒ－α，ＴＮＦ－α）的检测。在静息Ｍφ培养上清液中，用两种方法均未测到ＴＮＦ－α；而脂多糖（ｌｉｐｏｐｏｌｙｓａｃｃｈａｒｉｄｅ，ＬＰＳ，１００μｇ／Ｌ）刺激组，用两种方法均测到大量ＴＮＦ－α；如ＬＰＳ与秋水仙碱（ｃｏｌｃｈｉｃｉｎｅ，Ｃｏｌ）联用，ＴＮＦ－α的产生受到抑制，ＢＡ法检测显示抑制率为９７％，而ＥＬＩＳＡ检测则显示抑制率为４２％，提示Ｃｏｌ对ＴＮＦ－α生物活性的抑制比对其生物合成的抑制更明显。此外，Ｃｏｌ在浓度≥１０μｍｏｌ／Ｌ时，可部分减轻ＴＮＦ－α对其靶细胞Ｌ９２９的毒性作用。文中对这两种方法的优缺点进行了比较与讨论。
Bioassay (BA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used to detect tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) secreted by macrophages (Mφ) in rats. . In resting Mφ culture supernatants, no TNF-α was detected by either method; and lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 μg/L) stimulated the group, and a large number of TNF-α were detected by both methods; When LPS was combined with colchicine (Col), the production of TNF-α was inhibited. The BA inhibition rate was 97%, while the ELISA assay showed that the inhibition rate was 42%, suggesting Col’s biological activity against TNF-α. The inhibition is more pronounced than its inhibition of biosynthesis. In addition, Col can partially reduce the toxic effect of TNF-α on its target cell L929 at a concentration of ≥10 μmol/L. The paper compares and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods.