论文部分内容阅读
在如何解决贸易争端这一问题上,中、美两方有着完全不同的思路。美国轮胎特保案看起来是一次商业利益行为,看起来是为了保护美国的轮胎产业,但事实上并非如此。原因有二,一是由于美国轮胎企业生产的多是高端轮胎,而中国出口的则多是低端轮胎,所以中美两国轮胎生产企业不存在竞争性。其次,美国除从中国进口低端轮胎外,也会从其他国家进口这些轮胎。因此,对中国输美轮胎实施管制,并不能根本改善美国轮胎企业的生存状况。
China and the United States have completely different ideas on how to resolve the trade dispute. The U.S. TDP case appears to be a commercial interest and appears to be protecting the U.S. tire industry, but it is not. There are two reasons for this. First, the tire manufacturers in the United States and the United States do not have to compete because most tire manufacturers in the United States produce mostly high-end tires while China exports mostly low-end tires. Second, apart from importing low-end tires from China, the United States imports these tires from other countries as well. Therefore, implementing control over China’s U.S.-bound tires does not fundamentally improve the U.S. tire industry’s survival.