论文部分内容阅读
个案研究显示,对于商业知识及社会经验较普通人更丰富、法律服务资源较普通人更优越、被害风险识别及控制能力较普通人更强的企业家群体而言,诸如强化被害风险提示、学习相关知识、寻求法律服务等“常规措施”对欺诈性被害预防未必奏效。相反,切断这些企业家展开被害中和的技术路径才是防止他们被害的关键。由此,原本用以解释青少年犯罪的中和技术理论,可拓展运用至企业家欺诈性被害问题。作为对传统中和技术理论的发展与完善,被害中和技术理论的构建与发掘成为必要。
Case studies show that for business groups and entrepreneurs who have richer business knowledge and social experience than ordinary people, superior resources for legal services over ordinary people, and risk identification and control of victims are stronger than the average person, such as strengthening the risk of victimization and learning Related knowledge, seeking legal services, etc. “Conventional Measures ” may not work for the prevention of fraudulent victimization. On the contrary, the key to preventing them from being killed is to cut off the entrepreneurial path of these entrepreneurs. Thus, the theory of neutralization technology originally used to explain juvenile delinquency can expand the issue of fraudulent victimization applied to entrepreneurs. As the development and improvement of the traditional neutralization technology theory, the construction and exploration of the victim neutralization technology theory becomes necessary.