我每年都选订几家美术刊物,长期以来.惟《国画家》年年入选订阅,主要在于《国画家》刊用的绘画作品基本保证了可读性,还时有作品使人耳目一新,叫人感觉拿自己有限的工资之部分订阅不冤枉。近两年,《国画家》相继发表陈传席先生的文章,读之,使我感觉该刊更可爱了。陈传席者,素昧平生,读其文,觉出语不同一般的评论家,曾听有人说他算金陵一怪,还算当代美术理论阵地上的一怪。怪者,大意是不正常,我想,是不是我们艺术天地里有太多的不正常,而正常的文艺批评和批评家就被视为不正常,乃至容 Every year, I have selected a few publications for a long time, but the “Chinese Painters” are selected for subscription each year, mainly due to the fact that the paintings used by the “Chinese Painters” have basically guaranteed readability and that there are works that make people refreshing. People feel part of their subscription to pay their own wages are not wronged. In the past two years, “Chinese painters” have published articles by Mr. Chen Chuan-xi and read them, making me feel that the magazine is even more lovely. Chen Chuan-sect, ignorant of life, read the text, feel different general commentator, who heard he said Jinling a strange, fairly modern art theory position on a strange. Weirdo, the effect is not normal, I think, is not our art there are too many abnormalities, and normal literary critics and critics were regarded as abnormal,