律师实质参与:公正的呼唤——以认罪认罚从宽制度与速裁程序结合试点为视角

来源 :贵州警官职业学院学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:tyybj2008
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
为了修正速裁程序试点中犯罪嫌疑人、被告人获得律师辩护比例较低而可能出现的刑事诉讼公正价值受到损害的后果,认罪认罚从宽处罚制度和速裁程序的结合性试点,应当设置激励律师作为犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的辩护人参与诉讼的法律帮助制度。在认罪认罚从宽处罚制度和速裁程序的结合性试点中,各个法律群体基于自身角色要求而主张权利/权力的协商过程,不仅有利于效率价值和公正价值的共同实现,而且有利于促进法律共同体的形成。 In order to remedy the consequences of the fair value of criminal proceedings that may be brought about by the relatively low proportion of lawyers defending criminal suspects and defendants in pilot pilots in pilot proceedings, the incentives should be set for the trial of the combination of lenient punishments and expedited punishments Lawyers as criminal suspects, defendants, lawyers to participate in legal aid system. In the trial of the combination of leniency system and speed arbitration process, each legal group advocates the negotiation of rights / power based on its own role requirements, which not only benefits the common realization of efficiency value and fair value, but also promotes the promotion of law Community formation.
其他文献
<正>"互联网+"代表一种新的社会形态,即充分发挥互联网在社会资源配置中的优化和集成作用,将互联网的创新成果深度融合于经济、社会各领域之中。在当前"互联网+"的大背景下,
地理复习是对已学过的地理知识进行重现或再认识,但重现不等于重复,如果教师习惯于罗列全部知识点,由学生死记硬背,这样“炒冷饭”式的地理复习课将会缺乏课堂效率,不利于学