论文部分内容阅读
对比国内外开放存取期刊网络平台知识服务,可为国内平台建设者和图书馆整合揭示开放存取期刊提供有益参考和借鉴。文章通过文献调研法、网络调研法,研究国内外知名的开放存取平台COAJ、Socolar、BioMed Central、Springer Open、PLoS OAJ、DOAJ提供的知识服务,包括:信息检索、全文获取、个性化定制和社交媒体互动等服务,对比分析开放获取期刊平台与订阅式期刊平台在知识服务功能和广度上的区别。总体上看,国外开放存取期刊平台的个性化知识服务水平较国内平台高;个性化服务项目日益增多,Alerts和RSS信息自主定制是各大平台的主流增值服务;服务功能趋向于集成化、系统化,特别是社交媒体的嵌入,使得科技知识的大众化推广成为可能,也为学术成果的计量评价提供了全新的社会化视角。
Compared with domestic and foreign open access journals online platform knowledge service, it can provide useful reference and reference for domestic platform builders and libraries to integrate and reveal open access journals. The article studies the knowledge services provided by COAJ, Socolar, BioMed Central, Springer Open, PLoS OAJ and DOAJ, which are well-known in the world through literature research method and internet research method, including information retrieval, full text acquisition, personalized customization and Social media interaction and other services, comparative analysis of open access journals platform and subscription journals platform in the distinction between the function and breadth of knowledge services. Generally speaking, the level of personalized knowledge service of overseas open access journals platform is higher than that of domestic platforms; the number of individualized service items is increasing day by day; the self-tailoring of Alerts and RSS information is the mainstream value-added service of major platforms; the service functions tend to be integrated, In particular, the embedding of social media makes it possible to promote the popularization of scientific and technological knowledge, and also provides a completely new social perspective for the measurement and evaluation of academic achievements.