论文部分内容阅读
关于本案中犯罪嫌疑人L的行为的定性主要有两种争议意见:第一种意见认为,L的行为构成抢劫罪;第二种意见认为,L的行为在性质上属于敲诈勒索行为,但因其数额未达“较大”标准,故L的行为不构成犯罪。
There are mainly two controversial opinions about the characterization of the criminal suspect L in the present case: the first one considers that L’s behavior constitutes a crime of robbery; the second one considers that L’s behavior is extortion in nature, The amount of less than “larger ” standard, so the behavior of L does not constitute a crime.