论文部分内容阅读
《联合国反腐败公约》的起草者对履约审议机制的建立采取了一种谨慎和务实的态度,为机制的建立确立了法律基础和工作原则,但是机制的具体制度则留给缔约国大会在公约生效后以决议方式确立。公约履约审议机制在本质上属于同侪审议,它遵循尊重主权、不干涉内政的国际法基本原则,并强调保密、非敌对性和非羞辱性等原则要求,在制度建设和实践中反映一种务实、循序渐进的特点。这些特点是由公约的国际法性质决定的,通过与国际人权条约履约审议机制的比较又可以看出该机制相对保守的特性。中国作为缔约国,高度重视参加《联合国反腐败公约》履约审议工作,在实施公约,加强能力建设,配合联合国公约秘书处工作等方式,采取了一系列积极举措。
The drafters of the UN Convention against Corruption have adopted a cautious and pragmatic approach to the establishment of a compliance review mechanism, establishing the legal basis and working principles for the establishment of the mechanism. However, the specific regime of the mechanism remains for the Assembly of States Parties to take effect on the Convention After the resolution established. The convention review mechanism is a peer review in nature. It follows the basic principles of international law that respect sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs and emphasizes the principle of confidentiality, non-hostility and non-humiliation. It reflects in the system construction and practice a pragmatic, Step by step characteristics. These characteristics are determined by the nature of international law of the Convention. The comparatively conservative nature of the mechanism can also be seen through comparison with the mechanism for the review of the compliance with international human rights treaties. As a signatory party, China attaches great importance to its participation in the performance review of the UN Anti-Corruption Convention and has taken a series of positive measures in implementing the convention, strengthening its capacity and cooperating with the UN Convention Secretariat.