论文部分内容阅读
对1997年修正的《中华人民共和国刑法》第356条该如何定性,我国刑法学界存在“特别累犯说”与“特别再犯说”的争论。其实,学者们对该条所作的“特别累犯说”与“特别再犯说”的定性都不科学。比较合理的做法是将1997年修正的《中华人民共和国刑法》第356条定性为注意性规范。这既是厘清1997年修正的《中华人民共和国刑法》第356条之规定与刑法总则关于累犯之规定之间关系的前提,也是正确解读该条规定之内容并进行司法适用的逻辑起点。
Regarding the definition of Article 356 of the “Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China” as amended in 1997, there is a dispute in our criminal law academia about “special recidivism” and “special recidivism”. In fact, scholars have made it unscientific about the characterization of this article as being “particularly offended” and “especially repeating”. It is more reasonable to define Article 356 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China as amended 1997 as an attentional code. This is not only the premise for clarifying the relationship between the provisions of Article 356 of the Criminal Law of the PRC as amended in 1997 and the provisions of the Criminal Law on recidivism but also the logical starting point for correctly interpreting the provisions of the article and for applying justice.