论文部分内容阅读
目前学界对司法方法论的探讨尚处在初始阶段,并未达成统一的认识。本文认为,司法方法论是研究司法现象的方法、方式、手段的综合性知识体系。从严格意义上来看,司法方法论不属于法学方法论,两者在研究对象、所属理论层面、自身定位及研究任务上都存在实质性区别。司法方法论的必要性和重要性体现在三个方面的司法过程中:即如何将法律运用于司法实践、如何对法律解释控制安排以及如何保障司法过程程序化。
At present, the academic field of judicial methodology is still in its infancy, did not reach a unified understanding. This paper argues that judicial methodology is a comprehensive knowledge system that studies the ways, means and means of judicial phenomena. Judging from the strict sense, the judicial methodology does not belong to the jurisprudence methodology, both of which have substantial differences in the research object, the theoretical level, their own positioning and research tasks. The necessity and importance of judicial methodology are reflected in three aspects of the judicial process: how to apply the law in judicial practice, how to interpret and control the legal arrangements and how to protect the judicial process.