论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨鼻胃镜(EG-470N5型)与麻醉胃镜(EG-450WR)检查方法对患者生命体征的影响。方法采用前瞻性分组方法对经鼻胃镜60例和麻醉胃镜60例患者检查前与检查时用心电监护仪对患者生命体征进行动态观察,分别记录心率(HR)、血压(BP)及血氧饱和度(SPO2)变化。结果经鼻胃镜检查患者检查前与检查时的HR、DBP及SpO2差异无统计学意义(P>0.05,其中SBP<0.05);麻醉胃镜检查患者检查前与检查时的HR、BP及SpO2的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组检查时异常的HR、BP及SpO2的差异无统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论经鼻胃镜检查的安全性优于麻醉胃镜检查。
Objective To investigate the influence of endoscopy (EG-470N5) and endoscopy (EG-450WR) on vital signs of patients. Methods The prospective grouping method was used to observe the vital signs of 60 patients with endoscopic nasal gastroscopy and 60 patients with endoscopic anesthesia before and during the examination. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and oxygen saturation Degree (SPO2) changes. Results There was no significant difference in HR, DBP and SpO2 between the patients undergoing nasal gastroscopy before and during the examination (P> 0.05, with SBP <0.05). The differences of HR, BP and SpO2 before and during the gastroscopy There was statistical significance (P <0.01). There were no significant differences in HR, BP and SpO2 between the two groups (P <0.01). Conclusion The safety of nasal endoscopy is better than that of gastroscopy.