论文部分内容阅读
目的比较大黄、芒硝外敷和红外线局部照射剖宫产切口脂肪液化的疗效。方法剖宫产切口脂肪液化患者168例,随机分为A组96例(大黄、芒硝外敷促进愈合),B组72例(红外线照射切口促进愈合),观察两组切口愈合时间和费用情况。结果A组切口愈合时间较B组稍短,差异无统计学意义。但A组费用远较B组低。结论腹部切口脂肪液化外敷大黄、芒硝明显缩短伤口愈合时间,且费用低,尤其适用于基层无红外线治疗仪的单位应用。
Objective To compare the efficacy of rhubarb, mirabilite top dressing and infrared partial irradiation cesarean section fat liquefaction. Methods One hundred and sixty-eight patients with fat liquefaction under cesarean section were randomly divided into group A (96 cases), group B (72 cases). The incision healing time and cost were observed. Results The wound healing time in group A was slightly shorter than that in group B, and the difference was not statistically significant. However, the cost of group A is much lower than that of group B. Conclusion Abdominal incision fat liquefaction topical rhubarb, mirabilite significantly reduce the wound healing time, and the cost is low, especially for the grass-roots units without infrared therapeutic apparatus application.