论文部分内容阅读
公正与效率是现代司法的两大价值目标。但是,由于公正与效率的不同属性决定了两者之间必然存在矛盾。在刑事司法领域,刑事简易程序成为协调司法公正与效率的最佳途径。在我国,刑事简易程序虽然在案件分流及提高诉讼效率方面发挥了重要作用,但仍然存在着严重问题:一方面,刑事简易程序一律采用开庭审理的方式,这对于可能判处管制、拘役等轻微刑事案件来说,程序过于繁琐;另一方面,对于被告人可能被判处两年、甚至三年有期徒刑的案件来说,程序又过于简单,没有保证控、辩、审三方的诉讼构造,不利于被告人基本人权的保护和司法公正的实现。因此,应根据“简者更简,繁者更繁”的原则,重构我国的刑事简易程序体系。具体说来,应增设处刑命令程序,专门处理可能判处管制、拘役、单处附加刑、一年以下有期徒刑及一年以下缓刑的轻罪案件。同时,在确保司法公正的前提下,改革现行的刑事简易程序,提高司法效率,避免单纯为了追求司法效率而损害司法公正。
Justice and efficiency are two major values of modern justice. However, due to the different attributes of fairness and efficiency, there is an inevitable contradiction between the two. In the area of criminal justice, criminal summary procedures have become the best way to harmonize justice and efficiency. In our country, although the summary of criminal procedure has played an important role in the diversion of cases and the enhancement of litigation efficiency, there are still serious problems: on the one hand, criminal summary proceedings are all handled in courtrooms, On the other hand, the procedure is too simple for the defendants to be sentenced to two years or even three years in prison, and the procedural structure of the parties involved in the control, defense and trial is not conducive to the construction of litigation. The defendant ’s protection of basic human rights and the realization of judicial fairness. Therefore, we should reconstruct the system of summary criminal procedure in our country based on the principle of simpler, more complicated and more complicated. Specifically, an order of execution should be established to deal with misdemeanor cases that may be subject to control, criminal detention, single sentence attachment, imprisonment of one year or less and suspended for one year or less. At the same time, under the precondition of ensuring judicial fairness, we should reform current criminal summary procedures and improve judicial efficiency so as to avoid impairing judicial fairness solely for the purpose of pursuing judicial efficiency.