不同于场所提供者,司法实践中对工具提供者商标间接侵权责任的争议相对较少,承担责任性质相对单一,侵权判断标准也相对清晰,一般情况下,工具提供者只有存在主观上故意时才承担帮助、教唆侵权责任。对于商标标识提供者侵权责任而言,虽然各国均有将其独立化立法的趋势,但在设定商标标识提供者承担侵权赔偿责任的主观构成要件往往高于商标直接侵权责任主观构成要件。因此,虽然单独立法对于保护商标权利人利益具有积极价值,但不能因单独立法而否 Contrary to the venues providers, there are relatively few disputes in judicial practice concerning the indirect tort liability of tool suppliers, the relatively simple nature of liability, and the relatively clear criteria for judgments of infringement. Under normal circumstances, only when there is a subjective intentional Assist, abetting tort liability. For the tort liability of trademark signatories, although all countries have the tendency to legislate for their independence, the subjective constitutional elements of liability for tort liability for setting up trademark signatories are often higher than the subjective elements of the trademark direct tort liability. Therefore, although separate legislation has positive value for the protection of the interests of trademark owners, it can not be because of separate legislation