论文部分内容阅读
野生动物致损采取何种救济途径直接影响着救济的社会效果和野生动物保护工作的有效开展。国内学者针对野生动物致损应适用救济途径的观点主要有:适用行政补偿,但需要完善该制度;直接适用民事赔偿;财产损害适用生态补偿,人身损害适用民事赔偿;适用行政赔偿。本文采用对比分析、社会实证分析等研究方法,通过对野生动物致损救济的基础理论、立法环境、社会救济效果和行政管理效率等方面的分析,对适用行政赔偿制度的可行性进行了探讨。
Ways to relief wildlife damage directly affect the social effects of relief and wildlife conservation work effectively. Domestic scholars for wildlife damage should apply relief approach point of view are: apply administrative compensation, but need to improve the system; direct application of civil compensation; property damage for ecological compensation, personal injury for civil compensation; applicable administrative compensation. In this paper, comparative analysis, social empirical analysis and other research methods, through the analysis of the basic theory of wildlife damage relief, the legislative environment, the effectiveness of social assistance and administrative efficiency, the feasibility of applying the system of administrative compensation is discussed.