论文部分内容阅读
我国的劳动合同法第四十条对于解雇保护采取法定事由说,而劳动部此前的执法解释又压缩了“劳动合同已经不能继续履行”的语义空间,这就使得劳动法中的倾斜保护思想偏向于极端,对用人单位过于苛刻。同时第四十八条对违法解雇情况下劳动者要求继续履行劳动合同的权利做了较为刚性的保护,使得劳动合同单方解除制度进一步失衡。长期看应当建立一套以“正当事由说”为基础的解雇限制制度;短期则可以通过加强司法解释以及赋予司法部门更多自由裁量权的方式消除立法不科学的消极后果。
Article 40 of China’s labor contract law takes statutory reasons for the dismissal protection and the previous law enforcement interpretation of the Ministry of Labor has compressed the semantic space of “the labor contract can no longer be fulfilled.” This makes the tilt protection in the labor law The idea is biased toward the extreme and the employer is too harsh. At the same time, Article 48 provides more rigid protection for laborers’ rights to continue to perform labor contracts under the circumstances of unlawful dismissal, which further unbalances the unilateral termination of employment contracts. In the long run, a system of dismissal restrictions based on the principle of “just cause” should be established. In the short term, the negative consequences of unscientific legislation can be eliminated by strengthening judicial interpretation and giving the judiciary more discretion.