论文部分内容阅读
循证决策是过去十几年间公共管理与公共政策实践与研究领域的一个热点话题。在学术界,针对循证决策的研究分化出鲜明的两派观点。支持循证决策的一方认为,循证决策能够为公共政策制定提供更好的政策方案,通过对社会情景条件与政府能力的关注与调节,政府就能够更好地发挥循证决策作用;反对一方则认为,循证决策较为单一地强调以科学研究为来源的信息证据,忽略了对政治环境的认知,存在本质上的缺陷。本文对循证决策的相关研究做了文献回顾,并提出,循证决策理论的核心价值贡献在于打破政策制定的陈旧传统,重构信息证据(尤其是科学知识)与公共政策的关系。
Evidence-based decision-making is a hot topic in the field of public administration and public policy practice and research over the past decade or so. In academia, the study of evidence-based decision-making divides into two distinct viewpoints. The party supporting evidence-based decision-making believes that evidence-based decision-making can provide a better policy solution for public policy making and that the government can better play its role as evidence-based decision-making through the concern and regulation of social conditions and government capabilities. It is believed that evidence-based decision-making more sole emphasis on scientific evidence as the source of information, ignoring the understanding of the political environment, there are inherent shortcomings. This paper reviews the literature of evidence-based decision-making and points out that the core value contribution of evidence-based decision-making theory lies in breaking the old tradition of policy making and reconstructing the relationship between information evidence (especially scientific knowledge) and public policy.