论文部分内容阅读
2001年中国入世后,国内外学者对中国加入议定书及“加入WTO法”进行了比较广泛和深入的研究。在2011年的原材料案裁决之后,国内外的研究进入了新阶段,尤其体现为对加入议定书法律地位等根本性问题的反思。中国的加入议定书包含了大量特殊义务,中国迄今作为当事方的WTO争端有半数以上与议定书条款有关,因此进一步深化加入议定书研究具有重要的实践价值。本文就议定书研究的方法论提出了建议,并就加入议定书的“间接适用论”以及2016年后其他成员是否有权在对华反倾销中继续使用特殊的价格比较方法这两个具体问题发表意见。
After China’s accession to the WTO in 2001, domestic and foreign scholars conducted a comparatively extensive and in-depth study on China’s accession to the Protocol and its “WTO accession”. After the raw material case ruling in 2011, the research at home and abroad has entered a new phase, especially reflecting on the fundamental issues such as the legal status of the accession protocol. China’s accession agreement contains a large number of special obligations. To date, more than half of China’s WTO disputes as parties have so far been related to the provisions of the Protocol. Therefore, it is of great practical value to further deepen the study on the accession to the Protocol. This paper puts forward some suggestions on the methodology of the study of the Protocol and comments on the “Indirect Applicability Theory” of joining the Protocol and whether other members have the right to continue using the special price comparison method in China’s anti-dumping after 2016 .