论文部分内容阅读
随着我国法律制度研究的不断深入,民间有关物权债权融合理论的争鸣不绝于耳。该理论对现行物权债权区分理论的认识基础提出质疑,并从物权和债权的历史起源、形成原理,以及二者性质、效力的角度论述融合的合理性;主张者认为物权与债权区分的二元结构论固步自封,应当适时修正现行民法理论和民法体例,以使我国将来的物权和债权立法更具超前性。不可否认,这种理论的提出对于立法前瞻性具有跨时代的积极影响,但本文认为,现阶段融合理论关于物权债权在涉他性效力和排他支配性方面仍缺乏合理论证。
With the deepening of the research on the legal system in our country, the debate over the theory of the integration of property right and creditor’s rights has been endless. This theory puts forward the question on the basis of cognition of the theory of the division of claims of real rights, and discusses the rationality of the fusion from the historical origin and forming principle of the real rights and claims as well as the nature and effectiveness of the two. Dualistic structure theory, we should amend the current civil law theory and civil law instance in time so as to make our future property and debt legislation more advanced. It is undeniable that this theory has a positive impact on the forward-looking legislation, but this article argues that the theory of fusion at the present stage is still lack of reasonable justification on property rights and exclusive dominance.