论文部分内容阅读
串通投标行为是日本《禁止私人垄断及确保公正交易法》(1947年法律第54号,以下简称《独占禁止法》)第3条所禁止的行为之一,属于不正当限制交易中的卡特尔行为的典型事例。在日本的违反《独占禁止法》的案例中,串通投标占有很大的比例。例如,1998年违反《独占禁止法》的27件案例(被依法采取措施的件数,下同)中有17件属于串通投标。到2001年,被依法采取措施的违反《独占禁止法》的38件案例中,串通投标就占了33件。根据公正交易委员会的统计,从1998到2003年,在总共145件违反《独占禁止法》的案件中,属于串通投标的有105件,占全体的72.4%。串通投标作为不公正限制交易行为的一种,要依法缴纳课征金。在2003年度的串通投标案件中,被处罚的课征
Collusive bidding is one of the prohibited acts in Article 3 of Japan’s “Prohibition of Private Monopoly and Assurance of Fair Trade Act” (1947, No. 54, hereinafter referred to as the “Exclusive Prohibition Act”), which belongs to the cartel A typical example of behavior. In the case of Japan’s violation of the “exclusive prohibition law,” collusive tendering accounts for a large proportion. For example, 17 of the 27 cases of violations of the Exclusive Ban Law in 1998 (the number of cases that have been legally prescribed, the same below) are collusive tenders. By 38% of 38 cases that were violated by the “Exclusive Prohibition Law” by law in accordance with the law, 33 cases were collusive tenders. According to the FTC, from 1998 to 2003, out of a total of 145 cases of violation of the Exclusive Ban Law, 105 cases were collusive tenders, accounting for 72.4% of the total. Collusive tendering as an unjust restriction of trading behavior, according to the law to pay levy. Collected in the 2003 case of bidding, the levy was imposed