论文部分内容阅读
本文从语言学的角度重新解释五四白话文运动和思想革命以及它们之间的关系。胡适、陈独秀、周作人等人提倡白话文运动和思想革命是正确的 ,但他们的论证却并不是要害的。五四时期 ,白话文运动和思想革命理论上是二分的 ,现实上却是一体的 ,这种一体性是五四新文学运动成功的根本原因。白话文运动既是语言工具运动 ,但更是思想运动 ,思想革命只有在语言变革的意义上才是可能的。
This article reinterprets the movement of the May 4th Movement of the vernacular language and the revolution of thought as well as the relationship between them from the perspective of linguistics. Hu Shih, Chen Duxiu, Zhou Zuoren and others advocate that the vernacular movement and the ideological revolution are correct, but their arguments are not crucial. During the May 4th Movement, the vernacular movement and the ideological revolution were theoretically divided into two parts, but in reality they were one and the unity was the fundamental reason for the success of the May Fourth New Literary Movement. The vernacular movement is both a linguistic and instrumental movement, but more a movement of ideas and an ideological revolution that are possible only in the sense of linguistic change.