论文部分内容阅读
前些年,湖南省湘潭市雨湖区某村村委会主任胡某谎称该村要成立劳动服务公司需要资金,向张某借款16.8万元。因当时该村村委会的印章胡某均可以自由使用,故胡某在借条上加盖了村民委员会的公章以及财务专用章。之后张某将借款直接打入胡某的账户。此后,胡某归还了部分借款后下落不明,故张某诉至法院要求胡某及村民委员会共同归还借款。根据我国《合同法》第49条规定:“行为人没有代理权、超越代理权或者代理权终止后以被代理人名义订立合同,相对
A few years ago, Humou, a village committee member of the Yuhu District in Xiangtan City, Hunan Province, lied to the village that it needed capital to set up a labor service company and borrowed 168,000 yuan from Zhang. Because at that time, the village committee’s seal Humou are free to use, so Humou chop in the affixing of the village committee’s official seal and financial seal. After Zhang borrow money directly into Humou’s account. Since then, Humou returned some of the whereabouts of unknown loans, so Zhang sued the court asked Humou and villagers committees to jointly return the loan. According to China’s ”Contract Law“ Article 49 provides: ”The perpetrator has no proxy, beyond the proxy or proxy after the termination of the contract in the name of the agent, the relative